<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final preparations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquideggproduct.com/final-preparations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquideggproduct.com/final-preparations/</link>
	<description>The Shawn Bradley of Weblogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:56:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.liquideggproduct.com/final-preparations/comment-page-1/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquideggproduct.com/?p=991#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>hm... real life? But this takes the assumption that the contestants have lives to tend to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm&#8230; real life? But this takes the assumption that the contestants have lives to tend to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie</title>
		<link>http://www.liquideggproduct.com/final-preparations/comment-page-1/#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquideggproduct.com/?p=991#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>That was a great point about accounting for real life, so that pretty quickly swung the pendulum into the two division scheme (away from Swiss).

Then, your appeal to my laziness completed the deal.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a great point about accounting for real life, so that pretty quickly swung the pendulum into the two division scheme (away from Swiss).</p>
<p>Then, your appeal to my laziness completed the deal.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.liquideggproduct.com/final-preparations/comment-page-1/#comment-3638</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquideggproduct.com/?p=991#comment-3638</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how may players you have, but 2 round robins with the winners of each section having a playoff might be a good idea.  Round robins are easier to run since you set up the sections, put the grid up, and let people play.

The problem with a swiss is you have to all the results in before pairing the next round.  As we saw in the last LEPers tournament that would not have worked since some of us couldn&#039;t play our opponent on the specific week scheduled.  Also a swiss is more work for you because you have to do pairings each week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how may players you have, but 2 round robins with the winners of each section having a playoff might be a good idea.  Round robins are easier to run since you set up the sections, put the grid up, and let people play.</p>
<p>The problem with a swiss is you have to all the results in before pairing the next round.  As we saw in the last LEPers tournament that would not have worked since some of us couldn&#8217;t play our opponent on the specific week scheduled.  Also a swiss is more work for you because you have to do pairings each week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

