Awards
Recent Comments
- Robert says: I’m in again–once more this...
- Donnie says: Thanks, although so far it looks like...
- Allen says: I’ll gladly donate a McDoanlds Gift...
- Donnie says: You know, I checked the spam, and there was...
- Donnie says: Hahaha. Yeah, clearly her body is part of...
- pgn4web says: If your blog is using wordpress.org, have a...
- CMoB says: Ofcourse they’re tough! Why do you think...
Chess Blogs
- Blue Devil Knight
- Blunderprone
- Castling Queenside
- Chess Improvement
- Chessaholic
- Chesstiger
- CHESSX
- CMoB
- Getting to 2000
- Hardcore Pawnography
- hiddenleaf
- Lousy@Chess
- Patzer’s Corner
- Robert Pearson's Chess Blog
- Rocky Rook
- Rolling Pawns
- Tacticus Maximus
- Temposchlucker
- The Chunky Rook
- The Knights of Castle Kimbark
- The Prodigal Pawn
- USCL news and gossip
Enemies
Not-Enemies
Pseudo-ads
Zombies
Corpses
Tag Cloud
Babes & Alleged Babes Bad Ads Bad Movie Night Blog News Burning Agony CG Chess Computer-fu Entertainment Gaming Grilled Cheese History In the News Mascot for President Mathematics Monday Fighter! North Korea Patently Ineffective Random Religion Science/Technology Snake Oil Sports Tournament of Lepers Uncategorized Uncomfortability Weaksauce Losers
Størê de Gârbágè
Archives
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (11)
- January 2010 (10)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (11)
- October 2009 (20)
- September 2009 (20)
- August 2009 (14)
- July 2009 (21)
- June 2009 (20)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (17)
- March 2009 (17)
- February 2009 (11)
- January 2009 (12)
- December 2008 (18)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (26)
- September 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (17)
- June 2008 (18)
- May 2008 (14)
- April 2008 (19)
- March 2008 (27)
- February 2008 (32)
- January 2008 (29)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (47)
- October 2007 (53)
- September 2007 (70)
- August 2007 (49)
- July 2007 (64)
- June 2007 (83)
- May 2007 (14)
ATOM
RSS


lovely!
Reply to David K, SeattleWould have been lovelier if I’d won it.
Reply to DonniePirc Alert! (Book) Not a bad game by you Donnie–last night occasionally in between moves of my game I watched your opponent dismember a 1930 USCF…but he can be had! Occasionally. With excellent play. I am definitely going to try and watch him and Tacticus live.
Reply to Wahrheit@Warheit: I’m going to try to watch all of that game, too.
Reply to Tacticus MaximusI forgot that I never commented on this game. I have a few things to say…
9.Bg7 is a mistake, I knew it during the game also. The idea was actually that the knight on d4 might be useful, but then a couple moves later I exchanged it anyways. The correct sequence was 9.Nc6 bc 10.h4, preventing your suggestion of …h5.
Also, as far as what I saw when playing a5. I wanted to defend the knight so that I could move my queen into a more aggressive position, but I had to be careful because you have a lot of checks. So for instance I initially wanted to play Qe6, but luckily for my fans I hesitated and found the strong reply
35.Qe6 Qf2 36.Ka3? (any other king move allows perpetual check along the back 2 ranks until White retreats his queen, should still be winning though) 36…Qc5 and now I don’t have a move, because after 37.Ka4 Qb5 I am losing a piece, and after any other king move I am losing the pawn and my knight will be hanging. So no mate there. Then there’s this move 35.Qd4 which threatens to come in behind the Black king on the long diagonal. And …e5 is out of the question because of d6, so bringing your Queen to e5 is the only way to stop the invasion. Then the queen trade was evaluated as winning for me because like I told you after the game, the knight plays against the f pawn and the king plays against the e pawn (the king is in the square).
But…usually I would find a move like a6 had I not been bias towards the line of thought that got us to that position in the first place.
a6! is a very good recommendation, in the game I was not looking for this type of solution. Basically if your king tries to chase the pawn down it fails because even though it is in the square and it can reach b7 before the pawn reaches a8, because of the knight it cannot capture on a8 and if it goes after the knight than it leaves the square. So that only leaves pushing the f pawn frantically and hoping, but hope is lost after 38.a6 f3 39.a7 f2 40.a8Q Kc7 41.Qc8 Kb6 42.Qf5 stopping the pawn. My way is not bad, obviously it is still winning, but a6 is easy to see and a very strong move.
Reply to drunknkniteRegarding a6: Crafty is a computer, so it would call Nc4 a blunder, since it doesn’t win as quickly (beyond its event horizon). I should have known better than to be mystified by that.
Reply to Donnie