Liquid Egg Product
The Shawn Bradley of Weblogs
"Can you think of any time when a [library] patron sitting at a computer and watching porn and masturbating would be acceptable behavior?"
-- Carl Monday

This just in: Palin hates women

Truly, Palin is that most dangerous of self-aggrandizing right-wing politico, a potentially very powerful woman full of moxie and nerve and intensely intolerant, extremist views who actually hates women. Really, you can’t get much more Republican than that.

Emphasis was the author’s.

Unbelievable that Republicans would back a VP that hates women. You McCain supporters have some ’splaining to do.

(The article is worth reading, BTW.)

Source: Evil: It’s the new good!

September 11th, 2008 3 comments
Posted by Donnie Filed under In the News, Patently Ineffective

3 Comments »

  1. Sarah Palin does not hate women. That is absurd. Liberals hate Sarah because she destroys a fundamental myth: women can get ahead in life without feminism, abortions and democrats. Liberals did the same thing with Clarence Thomas. They tried to destroy him because he got into a position of power without Jesse Jacksons help. What is hilarious to me is that the more the democrats try to smear Palin and paint her as an evil person, the more their credibility dissolves. McCain Palin will win this election because the world is seeing what Liberals truly are now: Selfish, lying, racist, hateful, sexist, envious, stereotyping, cheating crybabies.

    Comment by Bulldada | 14 September 2008

  2. Um, I kinda hate to defend liberals, but I don’t think they have most if any of those things as inherent qualities. And isn’t calling all of most any group “stereotyping”… um, stereotyping? There is one negative aspect however that I do think liberals have inherently: wrongness. But the feeling is mutual I’m sure. Lastly, I may be mistaken, but I felt sure this post was a joke, not the actual view of LEP. Besides these points, I’m sympathetic with much of what you say.

    Comment by l3rucewayne | 14 September 2008

  3. @Bulldada: Guess you haven’t visited much. The post was intended to highlight the ridiculous nature of the quote.

    Or you’re a pretty good troll.

    @l3rucewayne: Yes, the post was in jest, thanks for catching on.

    The stereotyping of the “other side” mainly helps energize the base, not adding new converts.

    Comment by Donnie | 15 September 2008

Leave a comment